Silence is no longer neutral

"Silence is no longer neutral" – The Complicity of Silence Silence has always been an accomplice. An empty space into which the powerful could retreat while the world carried on speaking—or chose not to. It was the white noise between words, the nothingness that passed for harmony. For neutrality. As if silence were a choice without consequences. But neutrality is a lie we tell ourselves to avoid action. The plaster over the mouth is no accident. It is the visible symbol of an unspoken agreement: I remain silent, so I don’t have to take a stand. It is the illusion that silence offers protection—from conflict, from responsibility, from the inconvenience of getting involved. Yet in truth, this silence is an act of complicity. A quiet yes to the way things are. A yes to the rules that were never spoken aloud. A yes to the idea that there are things we do not name—not because we cannot, but because we have chosen not to. "Silence is no longer neutral" is not a call for noise. It is a revelation: Silence was never neutral. It was always a side. The side of those who benefit when no one asks questions. The side of those for whom the status quo is comfortable. The side of those who know that most people would rather stay silent than risk their voice being too much. The moment the plaster is torn away is not a triumph. It is a confession: that neutrality was a fiction. That silence was never an absence of power, but its tacit endorsement. That the real danger was never in speaking—it was in keeping things the same. The question is not whether to speak. The question is: Whom does your silence serve?

Media

Video

Chain

TEZOS

Network

Tezos

Contract

KT1HQqTXoFHwXgA3BGVz5Nz1UKSBhe8EJFg5

Token ID

24